LIBRARY: Are "Doing Well" and "Doing Good" Contradictory Goals of Privatization?

HOME | What's New! | Contact Us | Site Map | Sign In

New in the Library » "Social Capital and Reentry to the Community from Prison"

Corrections Library

Self-Study Options

Assisted Research

Loading...

Are "Doing Well" and "Doing Good" Contradictory Goals of Privatization?

PDF

Are "Doing Well" and "Doing Good" Contradictory Goals of Privatization?

Downloaded 14 times since 12/04/2006.

Thomas, Charles W.

National Institute of Corrections (Washington, DC)

Published 1993. 5 pages.

This article addresses the fear of many organizations that private corporations will forfeit quality in correctional services for profit. Thomas examines the cost savings of privatization and he analyzes the quality of service provided by contracting agencies. Overall, his analysis finds that private corrections management does save money for the government and that the caliber of correctional services is not compromised in the process. Accession Number: period98

Related Documents

Indications point to a strong movement to the requirement of smoke-free jails. This can be seen in: the increasing number of jails instituting ...
:: View Details
Briefing Paper: Smoke-Free Jails
This article discusses a no-smoking policy which was predicated on reports by the U.S. Surgeon General and the National Academy of Sciences, which ...
:: View Details
Kern County Develops No-Smoking Policy in Jails
...
:: View Details
The Department of Justice Can Do More to Help Improve Conditions at State and Local Correctional Facilities
...
:: View Details
Conditions in Local Jails Remain Inadequate Despite Federal Funding for Improvements
Conditions of confinement in Tennessee jails are recounted. Sections of this report are: executive summary; introduction; analysis and conclusions ...
:: View Details
The State of Tennessee's Jails
The author expresses his opinion on the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Wilson v. Seiter. The judgement of "deliberate indifference" will not ...
:: View Details
A Wholly False Sense of Security: Wilson v. Seiter and Jail Litigation
This opinion holds that the double celling in question at the Ohio maximum security prison is not cruel and unusual punishment prohibited by the ...
:: View Details
Rhodes, Governor of Ohio, et al. v. Chapman et al., Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
"The report is the culmination of over three months of research and interviews to evaluate the District of Columbia's efforts to place approximately ...
:: View Details
Inspection and Review of the Northeast Ohio Correctional Center
A Court of Appeals affirmed that in a pretrial detainee facility double-bunking, enforcement of the publisher only rule, prohibition against receipt ...
:: View Details
Bell, Attorney General, et al. v. Wolfish et al. Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Torture is prohibited by law in the U.S. It is occurs, it is an aberration, and the perpetrators are subject to criminal prosecution. This report ...
:: View Details
U.S. Department of State Initial Report of the United States of America to the UN Committee Against Torture

Viewed 5254 times since 10/31/2006 | Last Modified: 10/31/2006 10:33:50 AM

:: USA.gov > U.S. Dept. of Justice > Bureau of Prisons > National Institute of Corrections > .:: Privacy & Disclaimers :: Accessibility ::.