HOME
|
What's New!
|
Contact Us
|
Site Map
| Sign In
Training
Find Training
Self-Study Training
Video / Satellite
Resources for Trainers
About Our Training
Services
Consulting
Research Assistance
Library
Browse the Online Library
Web Site Directory
Popular Topics
Ask A Research Expert
About the Library
Community
Corrections News/Blogs
Discussion Forums
Shared Files
FREE! Join Now!
Projects
Learn about what we are working on and locate opportunities for assistance, research, and training related to key topics in corrections.
About Us
Overview
Divisions
History
Mission & Goals
Organizational Structure
Advisory Board
Employment Opportunities
Cooperative Agreements
Publications
Corrections News
» "
Release Planning for Successful Reentry, A Guide
"
Library
Corrections Library
Self-Study Options
Browse Online Library
Web Site Directory
Popular Topics
Online Curricula
Video Learning
Assisted Research
Ask A Research Expert
Ask Your Colleagues
Loading...
A Broken System: Error Rates in Capital Cases, 1973-1995
View/Download
A Broken System: Error Rates in Capital Cases, 1973-1995
Downloaded 92 times since 12/04/2006.
Author(s)
Liebman, James S.
Fagan, Jeffrey
West, Valerie
Details
Published 2000.
444 pages.
Related Topics
Capital punishment
(Justice System)
Court cases
(Justice System)
Legal issues
(Justice System)
Research
(Statistics &Research)
Being the first statistical study of modern capital appeals in the U.S., this report shows that "judicial review takes so long precisely because American capital sentences are so persistently and systematically fraught with error that seriously undermines their reliability" (p. i). This statement is supported by the fact that the overall rate of prejudicial error in the U.S. capital punishment system is 68%. Report contents include: executive summary; summary of central findings; confirmation from a parallel study; implications of central findings; the capital review process; the study; the national capital punishment report card; state comparisons; and conclusion -- a broken system and the need for research into causes. Appendixes include: state capital punishment report cards; federal circuit court and regional capital punishment report cards; incomplete list of capital judgments reversed on state post-conviction or related types of review; examples of serious error warranting Federal Habeas Corpus relief; and tables and figures. Also included is the supplement entitled "Examples of Serious Error Warranting State Post-Conviction or Federal Habeas Corpus Relief; with Contact Information."
Accession Number: 016178
Related Documents
Being the first statistical study of modern capital appeals in the U.S., this report shows that "judicial review takes so long precisely because ...
::
View Details
A Broken System: Error Rates in Capital Cases, 1973-1995
Information regarding the federal death penalty system since the enactment of the first modern capital punishment statute in 1988 is presented. ...
::
View Details
The Federal Death Penalty System: A Statistical Survey (1988-2000)
Since the death penalty was restored in 1977, 33% of all executions in the U.S. have occurred in Texas. Narrated by Warden Jim Willett, this audio ...
::
View Details
All Things Considered: Witness to an Execution: A Day in the Life of a Death Row Employee [and] Witness to an Execution Transcript
While Texas, Florida, and Alabama have imposed the death penalty upon juveniles the most, 23 states permit the execution of offenders who committed ...
::
View Details
Juveniles and the Death Penalty
Information regarding decision-making processes and demographic factors in federal capital cases is presented. This report is divided into the ...
::
View Details
The Federal Death Penalty System: Supplementary Data, Analysis and Revised Protocols for Capital Case Review
Recommendations for "urgently needed" reforms in the death penalty system are presented. Recommendations are organized into eight areas: effective ...
::
View Details
Mandatory Justice: Eighteen Reforms to the Death Penalty
The deterrence effect of the death penalty on crime in general and homicides in particular is reviewed. The following sections comprise this paper: ...
::
View Details
Research on Death Penalty and Related Topics
A guide "to help jurisdictions that authorize the death penalty conduct comprehensive reviews of the laws, processes, and procedures relevant to the ...
::
View Details
Death without Justice: A Guide for Examining the Administration of the Death Penalty in the United States
Factors that contribute to the excessive mistakes found in capital cases and policy options available to engage these grievous capital errors are ...
::
View Details
A Broken System, Part II: Why There Is So Much Error in Capital Cases, and What Can Be Done About It
Findings from two studies are presented that show that racism continues to distort the use of the death penalty. This report contains the following ...
::
View Details
The Death Penalty in Black &White: Who Lives, Who Dies, Who Decides
Viewed 3078 times since 10/31/2006
| Last Modified: 10/31/2006 10:33:39 AM
::
USA.gov
>
U.S. Dept. of Justice
>
Bureau of Prisons
>
National Institute of Corrections
>
.::
Privacy & Disclaimers
::
Accessibility
::.